🔗 Share this article

Throughout the previous presidential campaign, the former president courted the electorate with promises to reduce prices starting on day one. However, after he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to the cost of living. All that changed after inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Shortly thereafter, his team launched a slapdash effort to address living costs. Regrettably, the drive is a disorganized endeavor—characterized by absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Just two days after the election, the president began his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from the wealthy leader—often mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for millions of Americans facing difficulties when visiting the grocery store. Essentially, he ignored their concerns as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could every price be decreasing when his cherished tariffs were increasing prices? Recent data show the cost of bananas increased 6.9% over the past year, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—partly because of punitive tariffs on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, costs increased in the majority of main grocery groups tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), drinks (up 2.8%), and fruits and vegetables (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Statements

Despite these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has stated there is “virtually no inflation,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements ignore the reality that general costs have clearly increased since Biden left office. At present, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that gas prices had dropped to around two dollars, even though official data indicate they average over three dollars.

Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” message portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. Many voters are angry about rising costs following assurances of reductions. As a result, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that new tariffs would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Effects

As certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist taking credit for putting out a blaze that he ignited. On another occasion, while speaking fast-food leaders, he declared that “this is the golden age of America” and told listeners that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when many risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans think the state of the economy are mediocre or bad, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. A separate survey showed that a majority of citizens say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Truth and Proposed Measures

Scott Bessent, the president’s chief financial officer, lately disputed claims of a prosperous era. He stated that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for eight months in a row and lost approximately 33,000 jobs this year. Citing these challenges, the secretary called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates—a move that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, Trump suggested a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact the proposal. The scheme would likely increase federal spending, increase borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for cost issues centered on creating 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could reduce monthly mortgage payments. But, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently cutting them by a small amount per month. The downside is that these loans could more than double the overall cost borrowers pay and hinder building home value.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Financial Outlook

As part of their cost-cutting effort, the administration have again blamed Biden for financial challenges, including rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, the former president left a robust economic situation, with low price growth, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. But, Trump’s policies—especially his tariffs—have resulted in an difficult situation, driving costs higher and reducing economic output.

Per Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if key regions like major economies tumble into recession, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, people generally possess less money to spend, and price increases often falls. Unfortunately, given the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.